GIVING PEACE A CHANCE

Remembering John Lennon during the week of his birthday, I wanted to reflect on the third Noble Truth of the Buddha’s teaching—the truth of the cessation of suffering—as a state of peace.

Peace is natural to the mind. As a natural state, the cessation of suffering is readily accessible. However, peace is not a fixed state. There is always suffering in our lives, and accepting our suffering is key to finding the peace that is already present. You might say peace is both intermittent and permanent. It is always there, but sometimes it becomes obscured by the tightness and difficulty that suffering induces.

Unfortunately, humans often identify more with pain than peace, becoming deeply attached to our suffering. It becomes personal, embedding itself in our body and psychology. By identifying with pain and devoting ourselves to struggling or avoiding it, we amplify the suffering. This is why, despite our tendency to assign blame, the second Noble Truth asks us to accept our role in our suffering. Blame is easy, but unfortunately, we are the only ones we can change. So, the first two Noble Truths involve accepting the truth of suffering and our part in it, as we identify with struggle. This is a war we cannot win, but we can accept, let go, and carry on.

John and Yoko posted on billboards in Times Square in 1970, “War is Over. If You Want It.” Trungpa Rinpoche coined the phrase “Victory Over War” and urged his students to develop confidence in basic human goodness. Dr. King saw the mountain and said, “I may not make it with you” and tragically he didn’t. But he pointed a way to peace that still influences our world today. But, can there be peace while there is so much war? I think there better be. Being free of suffering is accessible any time we are open to it, even as wars continue around us. Whatever its social implications, “giving peace a chance” is crucial on a personal level. War is over if we want it. A decade after his famous billboards the country had swung to the right under Reagan. Just before his death in 1980, Lennon was asked if the peace and love generation didn’t feel a bit naive in retrospect. He said, if you smile and someone hits you in the mouth, it doesn’t mean the smile didn’t exist.

In the midst of our suffering, and our struggle with suffering, we can remember that nothing is permanent—not even suffering. Like its absence, suffering is there when we allow it to be. Since both suffering and peace are always with us, it becomes a matter of where we place our identification. Suffering feels urgent, so it garners our attention. It takes training the mind to turn away from habitual beliefs and see things in a fresh way. The bad news is that everything is impermanent, but the good news is that everything is impermanent.

Buddhist teachings highlight that fear of impermanence is one of the causes of our suffering. Our inability to let go of aspects of our mind and life that are needing to  change or come to an end creates great friction. Ironically, while impermanence is painful, it is also what provides relief—because suffering is impermanent too. So, how can something always present be impermanent? Things are “intermittently permanent.” They are always with us, but like the weather, they are always changing. There are times when the weather is beautiful and times when it is threatening. While it’s important to enjoy life when the skies are clear, it may also be important to evacuate when hurricanes come. Florida is a poignant example—paradise that is intermittently deadly.

Perhaps it’s our lot to prepare for the worst and live for the best.

From a meditation perspective, we are letting go and opening up. But as a race of beings, we are too fearful to open up heedlessly. Still, we can look at ourselves: is our life based on fear? Can we give peace a chance, even intermittently? Pema Chödrön was once asked the point of meditation, and she asked her students if they ever experienced interruptions to their pain. In Buddhism, we refer to these as “gaps.” These gaps are pauses in our identification with the struggle of maintaining the fiction we call “Me.” A student answered, “Yes, I experience slight gaps now and then.” Pema smiled and said, “Our work is to make those gaps longer.”

Finally, the cessation of suffering is both the fruition of the path and a foundational state necessary for any creative endeavor. It is also an ongoing possibility. If we cling to the idea of cessation, we miss the point, turning something intermittent into something perceived as solid—another source of suffering. The possibility of peace is here now, even as we lose it by thinking about it. Peace is a felt sense. It is connecting to a part of our being that has always been there, and according to Buddhist thought, that peace is not diminished or changed by suffering.

Even in the middle of war, there are moments when soldiers connect to peace, despite the shelling around them. It takes courage to stay connected to the heart amidst danger. The image of the Bodhisattva is of a person who enters the war while keeping peace in their heart. In doing so, their very presence brings healing to those in pain. In this way, they bring peace.

We don’t have to change the world. But we can allow ourselves to change—slowly, carefully, and completely—if we just give it a chance.

THE DECISION POINT

Which Way to Go Depends on Where I’m Going

In the past, the inflection points my life have been poorly considered. These junctures were opportunities to directly engage my life, and perhaps steer it into a fruitful direction. However, driven by the anxiety and pressure I always lived under, I’d jump past these moments trying to reach some supposed, imposed goal, usually landing in a new version of the same mess. This pattern defied my ADHD.  My patterns of disability have stayed with me longer than most of my jobs and all of my loves.

As I began to study mindfulness training, it became clear that before stepping into a decision point I needed to know where I was, and where I was heading. Mindfulness of where I am was a process of seeing the self-imposed limitations that held me chained to patterns of habit. But what if I was to set those aside? Once free of my cage, where would I go? That’s a sobering thought. Perhaps that is why we stay stuck where we are, or in my case lurch forward out of – and then into – the same old mud.

I think of the story of bluesman Robert Johnson at the Mississippi crossroads, where, as the legend goes, he sold his soul to the devil to be the greatest blues guitarist. His choice, though fateful, shaped a musical legacy that still resonates today. In life, our crossroads, or decision points, feel binary—right or wrong, good or bad, as though we were “caught in the devil’s bargain” as Joni Mitchell famously wrote. I think it’s a way of spiritual self soothing to place ourselves between absolute good and absolute evil. Then we know where we are. But for many of us much of the time, one way feels more appealing than the other and so we are locked in turmoil on our dirt road.

Robert Johnson stood at the crossroad and made a choice to sell his soul to the devil. And the world begat more soul because of it. Did he lose his soul simply because he followed his passion? This split screen right or wrong may be helpful to controlling agents such as political movements, or churches in league with the state, but for me it is not an effective way to make a mindful decision. The Buddhist perspective of the middle path rests within the binary, seeing decision points as nuanced and provisional. Sometimes a left turn is the right choice, other times the opposite direction is appropriate. Pausing to reevaluate may be necessary no matter our pressure to decide. Yet, before I know which way to turn, it seems important to know where I’m going.

So, despite decisions being dependent on the moment, they hold meaning when they’re guided by principles larger than the moment. Where am I and where am I heading? These questions are the foundation of a mindful path. A mindful path is a wisdom path, despite what we may call it. Am I heading toward greater understanding of my mind my world?

This guiding principle is deeply personal. As a Buddhist I orient myself toward the two-step process foundational to Buddhism. First, the path of personal liberation is working on myself so that I can see more clearly and be less reactive. While I may never fully escape my inner struggles, the journey to transform them is what empowers me and allows me to open my heart to others. The second stage is that I open my process toward benefiting others. Bringing these together, my aspiration is to understand myself, so that I can understand others and be a benefit to my world. Aspiring to benefit others actually reduces the pressure I feel as it creates more room for me. I don’t have to do it on my own, but I can play my part for the benefit of others. So, at each juncture I might ask, is this good for me? And will it help me connect to my world? If I become an amazing blues guitarist along the way, so much the better.

Ultimately, responsibility is mine. No matter how difficult life gets, I am accountable for my actions and for the wounds that shape those actions. While life is greater than me, it is still my responsibility to steer my own ship. I remind myself: what others think is not my business. If something unsettles me, it’s likely pointing to a vulnerability within myself. In any altercation, I can avoid blame and see what it is I can change. All I can change with any certainty is myself. So, why does this hurt? What is it in me that is laying myself open for disappointment? Am I asking too much from someone? Am I expecting someone to fix my life? Those approaches don’t help me. Looking into my heart and seeing how my wounds are shaping me allows me to see how others are similarly trauma shaped. And then rather than demanding from my life, I can actually give back. And for me, that is the greatest feeling.

At every crossroads, the way forward becomes clearer when we are guided by an understanding of where we are going. So, at each juncture I can pause and ask Is the benefitting me? AND is it benefit to my world?

If I choose to help someone who is hurting me, I may be limiting my ability to be a functional and helpful member of my society. If I help only myself, the pressure is all on me. And I find limited joy in always thinking of myself. My life is too small and so there is never enough. Me-me-me needs more-more-more.

Making choices that lead to benefiting myself and my world is a sustainable principle to help me forward. I don’t have to get there, or anywhere in particular. I just need the willingness to eyes open as I let go.